Indian Reasoning and Debating
- 30 Hours
- UG/PG
- Foundation, Law, Management
- Faculty
₹2,500.00(GST additional)
About The Course
Course enables exploration of the rich tradition of debate exchanges, definitions and classification systemsfound inBhāratīya Śāstra-s and development ofthe skillsto become a persuasive communicator with the ability to: ● Defend statements using clear and logical reasoning ● Choose relevant statements for defence ● Support arguments with well-chosen, explanatory and thoroughly analyzed evidence
Syllabus
- Unit I: Introduction to Indian Reasoning and Debating Techniques
- ● Introducing Bharatiya Knowledge Systems
- ● 14 & 18 Vidyasthanas
- ● Vedas
- ● Vedangas
- ● Introducing Darshanas
- ● Types of Darshanas: Astika and Nastika
- ● Elements of Darshana
- ● Introducing Elements of Indian Reasoning and Debating Techniques
- ● Introduction to Nyaya Shastra
- ● Gautama
- ● Nyaya as Darshana
- ● Nyaya as Vada Shastra
- ● Prachina & Navya Nyaya
- ● The Theory of Evidence (Pramāṇa)
- ● Knowing Directly – Pratyaksha
- ● Knowing Indirectly – Anumana, Upamana & Shabda
- ● Introduction to the Concept of Cognition
- ● Types of Cognition
- ● Recollection & Experience
- ● Definition of Cognition
- ● The Process of Responses
- ● Cognition Framework
- ● Fundamental Elements of Information Processing
- ● Prama, Prameya & Pramana
- ● Substantive-Relation-Property Triad Structure
- ● Examples on Prama, Prameya & Pramana | Substantive-Relation-Property Triad
- ● Pramana: Introduction, Definition and Types
- ● Pratyaksha: Laukika and Alaukika
- ● Examples on Laukika & Alaukika
- Unit II: The Indic Approach to Robust Reasoning
- ● Introducing Anumana
- ● Convincing Oneself – Swartha-Anumana
- ● Convincing Others – Parartha-Anumana
- ● Anumanaprayoga – Paksha, Sadhya & Hetu
- ● Nyayaprayoga
- ● The Five Limbs of Structured Reasoning – Pratijñā, Hetu, Udāharaṇa, Upanaya and Nigamana
- ● Relevant Examples to Understand Paksha, Sadhya & Hetu | Nyayaprayoga
- ● The Triple Nature of a Sound Reason or Evidence (Hetu)
- ● Anvaya-Vyatireki
- ● Kevalanvayi
- ● Kevala-Vyatireki
- ● Relevant Examples to Understand Anvaya-Vyatireki, Kevalanvayi & Kevala-Vyatireki
- ● Invariable Concomitance (Vyāpti)
- ● Purvapaksha
- ● Siddhanta
- ● Vyatireka
- ● Relevant Examples to Understand Purvapaksha, Siddhanta & Vyatireka Vyaptis
- ● Processes Involved in Inference: Bhuyodarshana, Pakshadharmata and Paramarsha
- ● Relevant Examples to Understand These Processes
- ● The Five Types of Pseudo-Reason or Pseudo-Evidence (Hetvābhāsa)
- ● The Deviation (Savyabhicāra)
- ● The Adverse (Viruddha)
- ● The Unestablished or Unproven (Asiddha)
- ● The Counter Balanced (Satpratipakṣa)
- ● The Contradicted (Bādhita)
- ● Relevant Examples to Understand These Types
- ● The Supportive Arguments (Tarka)
- Unit III: Definition Making
- ● The Theory of Definition
- ● Usage of Definitions in Reasoning and Debating
- ● Types of Definitions
- ● Swarupa-Lakshana
- ● Tatastha-Lakshana
- ● Purpose of Definition
- Unit IV: Nature and Form of a Debate
- ● Introducing Bharatiya Debate Systems
- ● Importance of Debating Techniques According to Nyaya Shastra
- ● Rules of Debate
- ● The Three Types of Debate: Vāda (An Honest Debate), Jalpa (Wrangling), Vitaṇḍā (Cavil)
- ● Definitions of These Types of Debates
- ● Rules of Disqualification in a Debate: The 22 Defeat Situations (Nigraha-Sthāna)
- ● False Rejoinders (Jāti)
- ● Putting Forth a Contrary Argument by Using a Term Willfully in an Ambiguous Sense (Chala)
- ● Good Qualities of a Debater: Learning, Knowledge, Memory, Talent or Imaginative Power, and Power to Deliver a Speech
- ● Weak Points of a Debater: Anger, Lack of Equanimity, Fear, Lack of Memory, and Inattention
- Unit V: Case Studies in Definitions and Debates: Exploring Perspectives
- ● Implementing the Theory of Definition Making – Murder vs Homoside
- ● Examples of Debate from Bharatiya Vangmaya – Tamas
- ● Examples of Debate from Bharatiya Vangmaya – Shabda According to Vaisheshikas
- ● Examples of Debate from Bharatiya Vangmaya – Shabda According to Nayyayika
- ● Examples of Debate from Bharatiya Vangmaya – Part and Whole as Independent Entities – Bauddha’s Purvapaksha
- ● Examples of Debate from Bharatiya Vangmaya – Part and Whole as Independent Entities – Vaisheshika’s Siddhanta
More Information
- Learning Objectives
- ● Understanding cognition, elements of reasoning and debating techniques
- ● Learning about error detection and fallacies in arguments
- ● Explain and demonstrate the classical Indian intellectual culture of inquiry
- Intended Outcomes
- ● Develop the art of reasoning and argumentation
- ● Develop the skill of debating based on the rigorous Indic method of Vada
- ● Application of Bhāratīya reasoning and debating concepts











