
Buddhist Reasoning and Debate: Foundations and Applications
- 20 Hours
- UG
- Upcoming Courses
- Faculty
(GST additional)
About The Course
This course provides an introduction to Buddhist reasoning and debate, offering both theoretical foundations and practical applications. It serves as a gateway to Buddhist and Hindu philosophical thought, equipping students with a structured approach to analyzing information, forming logical arguments, and engaging in critical discussions. The course is not just about Buddhist reasoning but also about cultivating a disciplined approach to logical inquiry, which can be applied across various fields of study.
Syllabus
- Unit 1: Introduction to Buddhist Reasoning and Debate (Laying the Groundwork for Logical Inquiry)
- 1 What is Buddhist Reasoning? – Its historical and philosophical significance.
- 2 The Role of Debate in Buddhist Thought – Why debate matters in intellectual traditions.
- 3 Preliminaries for Buddhist Debate – Key terminologies and concepts.
- 4 The Human Condition in Buddhist Philosophy – How logic is used for self-inquiry.
- 5 Reasoning in the Buddhist Context – The link between logic, ethics, and enlightenment.
- 6 Introduction to Key Logical Structures – The basics of comparison, inference, and analysis.
- 7 Understanding the Four Possibilities in Logical Structures – Exploring inclusion, exclusion, and neutrality.
- 8 The Three Possibilities – Core logical categories and their significance.
- 9 Logical Categories in Everyday Thinking – How Buddhist logic can refine modern reasoning.
- 10 Practical Exercise – Identifying Buddhist reasoning patterns in real-world debates.
- Unit 2: Foundations of Buddhist Logic and Argumentation (The Structure of Thought and Syllogistic Reasoning)
- 11 Introduction to the Buddhist Syllogism – Argument forms and components.
- 12 Statements of Qualities vs. Statements of Pervasion – Two key modes of reasoning.
- 13 What Statements of Pervasion Imply – Logical progression and necessity.
- 14 Elements of a Valid Syllogism – Subject, predicate, and logical connection.
- 15 Correct and Incorrect Signs in Logical Argumentation – Identifying strong and weak reasoning.
- 16 Understanding Forward Pervasion and Counterpervasion – Directionality in inference.
- 17 The Only Two Valid Syllogistic Forms – How arguments are structured.
- 18 The Three Types of Correct Signs – Effect, Nature, and Nonobservation signs.
- 19 Debate Practice: Constructing and Analyzing Syllogisms – Applying theoretical knowledge.
- 20 The Epistemological Foundations of Buddhist Logic – How knowledge is validated.
- Unit 3: Buddhist Ontology and Logical Categories (Understanding Reality Through Logical Classification)
- 21 Basic Buddhist Ontology – The classification of reality.
- 22 The Concept of Selflessness in Buddhist Thought – Refuting inherent identity.
- 23 Types of Existents and Non-existents – What exists and what doesn’t.
- 24 The Seven Divisions of Existents – A structured approach to understanding reality.
- 25 The Three Types of Functioning Things – Matter, Consciousness, and Nonassociated Factors.
- 26 External and Internal Matter – Classification and characteristics.
- 27 The Role of Consciousness in Logical Perception – How the mind processes reality.
- 28 Sense Consciousnesses vs. Mental Consciousnesses – Their functions and implications.
- 29 Mutual Inclusion and Exclusion in Ontology – Logical relationships between categories.
- 30 Exercise: Applying Ontological Categories to Modern Issues – Social and ethical analysis.
- Unit 4: Valid Cognition and Reasoning in Debate (How We Know What We Know – The Basis of Rational Thought)
- 31 Consciousness and Its Role in Perception – The Buddhist approach to knowing.
- 32 Direct Perceivers and Thought Consciousnesses – Understanding cognition.
- 33 Unpacking Wrong Consciousness and Uncertain Knowledge – Avoiding cognitive mistakes.
- 34 Inferential Cognition and Its Role in Reasoning – When perception is not enough.
- 35 Valid Cognition in Buddhist Epistemology – Establishing certainty.
- 36 Analyzing the Three Spheres: Agent, Action, and Object – Their logical relationships.
- 37 Choosing a Debate Partner – How to structure meaningful dialogue.
- 38 Debating the Nature of Reality – Constructing and deconstructing arguments.
- 39 Misfires in Debate: Rhetoric, Bullying, and Logical Fallacies – Identifying poor reasoning.
- 40 Case Study: Applying Buddhist Reasoning to Contemporary Issues – Ethical dilemmas and policy discussions.
- Unit 5: Interactive Debate and Practical Engagement (Applying Buddhist Logic in Discussion and Inquiry)
- 41 The Purpose of Debate in Buddhist Thought – Seeking truth over victory.
- 42 Roles of the Challenger and the Defender – Structure of a Buddhist debate.
- 43 The Three Purposes of Debate – Learning, analysis, and refutation.
- 44 Defining Key Debate Structures – Logical frameworks.
- 45 One and Different: How We Categorize Concepts – Logical predicates in debate.
- 46 Consequences in Debate – Understanding implications of statements.
- 47 Step-by-Step Debate Procedures – Practical applications.
- 48 Building Strong Argumentation Skills – Enhancing philosophical discourse.
- 49 Interactive Debate Session – Engaging in structured argumentation.
- 50 Final Discussion and Course Reflection – Applying skills beyond Buddhist reasoning.
More Information
- Learning Objectives
- ● Develop a foundational understanding of Buddhist logic and reasoning within philosophical and doctrinal traditions.
- ● Cultivate critical thinking and structured argumentation skills through engagement with Buddhist debate techniques.
- ● Apply Buddhist syllogism and reasoning structures to contemporary philosophical, ethical, and social issues.
- ● Foster intellectual discipline, open inquiry, and engagement with diverse perspectives.
- ● Equip students with the ability to analyze, compare, and construct reasoned arguments in philosophical and real-world contexts.
- Intended Outcomes
- ● Explain the fundamental principles of Buddhist reasoning and debate.
- ● Analyze the relationship between perception, logic, and argumentation in Buddhist philosophy.
- ● Engage in structured debate using Buddhist syllogistic reasoning.
- ● Differentiate between valid and invalid forms of reasoning within the Buddhist framework.
- ● Apply Buddhist logic to philosophical, ethical, and modern critical thinking contexts.